The sanctity of life is a fundamental biblical principle, yet it remains a hotly debated topic in today’s political arena. As we approach the 2024 presidential election, understanding where candidates stand on issues like abortion and euthanasia is crucial for making informed decisions. This blog post aims to explore these life-and-death issues through a biblical lens, compare the positions of the presidential candidates, and evaluate how these stances align with a biblical worldview.

The Bible clearly values human life, from conception to natural death. Psalm 139:13-16 speaks of God’s intimate involvement in our creation:


Jeremiah 1:5 further highlights our purpose from the womb:

John MacArthur emphasizes the divine image in every human life, arguing that any action undermining this is contrary to God’s will. He states, “Human life is sacred because it is made in the image of God. To assault human life in any form is to assault God Himself” (MacArthur, 2006).

C.S. Lewis, in his reflections on morality and human value, underscores the inherent worth of every person, made possible by God’s creative work. He writes, “There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilizations—these are mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub, and exploit” (Lewis, 1947).

The Republican platform under Donald Trump’s leadership maintains a strong pro-life stance, emphasizing the protection of the unborn. The platform calls for the end of late-term abortions and the protection of infants born alive during failed abortion procedures. It supports policies that advance prenatal care, access to birth control, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments while opposing taxpayer-funded abortions and Planned Parenthood (Republican National Committee, 2024).

Kamala Harris and the Democratic platform advocate for a woman’s right to choose, supporting unrestricted access to abortion services. The platform seeks to codify Roe v. Wade, ensuring that abortion remains legal nationwide and opposes any federal or state restrictions on abortion. The platform also supports the right to physician-assisted euthanasia under specific circumstances, advocating for policies that respect personal autonomy at the end of life (Democratic National Committee, 2020).

Donald J. Trump: The Republican stance on abortion is firmly pro-life, opposing abortion in almost all circumstances except where the life of the mother is at risk. This position aligns closely with the biblical view that life begins at conception and should be protected.

Kamala Harris: The Democratic stance advocates for the right to choose, supporting unrestricted access to abortion services. This position conflicts with the biblical view on the sanctity of life, which sees every unborn child as a creation of God.

Donald J. Trump: The Republican platform opposes euthanasia, emphasizing the protection of life until natural death. This aligns with the biblical perspective that life is sacred and only God has the authority to end it.

Kamala Harris: The Democratic platform supports the right to physician-assisted euthanasia under specific circumstances. This stance diverges from the biblical view, which upholds the sanctity of life and rejects the taking of life, even to alleviate suffering.

Overall, Donald J. Trump’s views are more closely aligned with the biblical perspective on the sanctity of life, both regarding abortion and euthanasia. Kamala Harris’s positions, while emphasizing personal autonomy and rights, diverge significantly from the biblical teachings on the value and protection of life.

In conclusion, while neither candidate perfectly aligns with the biblical view on life, it’s important to consider which platform more closely reflects God’s principles. Donald J. Trump’s stance on abortion and euthanasia aligns more closely with the biblical perspective, advocating for the protection of life from conception to natural death. Kamala Harris’s positions, while emphasizing individual rights and autonomy, diverge from the biblical teachings on the sanctity of life.

Reflect on these insights and pray for wisdom as you prepare to vote. Consider how your decisions can reflect your commitment to upholding the biblical view of life’s sanctity.

Share your thoughts in the comments below and discuss how we can advocate for a culture of life in our communities. Let’s commit to making informed decisions that honor God’s design for life.

It is crucial to vote with a conscience informed by Scripture, seeking leaders who will uphold the sanctity of life. As believers, we are called to be salt and light in the world, standing firm on the truths of God’s Word and advocating for the protection of all human life.

By applying a Biblical Worldview to contemporary issues, we aim to discern how best to live out our faith in today’s complex and often contentious cultural landscape. This perspective shapes our understanding of justice, morality, and the purpose of human existence. It is my prayer that this series will help you see the importance of evaluating social and political issues through the lens of Scripture, ultimately leading to informed and faithful political engagement.